【性价之王】	【线路之王】	【价格之王】	【配置之王】
【免费之王】	【香港首推】	【梯子之王】	【独服之王】

UBI跑分：

Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Process Creation 1 2 3

4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: s1: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab059.7 -- #1 SMP Tue Jul 24 19:12:01 MSK 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, In tel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, In tel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, In tel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, In tel virtualization
11:59:33 up 3 days, 22:22, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 30 2012 11:59:33 - 12:27:26
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10674486.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1899.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2233.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 306430.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 88675.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 841940.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 528914.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 76690.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4110.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3325.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1235.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 449477.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10674486.8 914.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1899.7 345.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 2233.7 519.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 306430.6 773.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 88675.3 535.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 841940.0 1451.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 528914.2 425.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 76690.8 191.7
Process Creation 126.0 4110.9 326.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3325.8 784.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1235.6 2059.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 449477.2 299.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 573.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 30 2012 12:27:26 - 12:55:25
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 37054335.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7316.0 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6884.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 344739.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 93343.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1028463.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1990870.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 272533.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 14912.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9916.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1184.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1371876.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 37054335.2 3175.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7316.0 1330.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 6884.9 1601.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 344739.3 870.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 93343.5 564.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1028463.0 1773.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1990870.5 1600.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 272533.8 681.3
Process Creation 126.0 14912.3 1183.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9916.7 2338.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1184.1 1973.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1371876.4 914.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1335.1

再看20美元一年的128内存的XEN，洛杉矶

Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: neal: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:39:05 UTC 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
12:20:30 up 15:30, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 30 2012 12:20:30 - 12:48:26
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10758263.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1780.4 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1309.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 226203.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 62157.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 626523.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 399960.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 44070.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2401.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2328.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 292.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 450518.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10758263.4 921.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1780.4 323.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 1309.2 304.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 226203.9 571.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 62157.9 375.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 626523.8 1080.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 399960.3 321.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 44070.6 110.2
Process Creation 126.0 2401.6 190.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2328.4 549.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 292.5 487.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 450518.7 300.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 387.4

建议你看看https://www.vps.com.in/read-budgetvm-enzu/

[budgetvm]历史优惠活动内容

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量

budgetvm→$12.5 月 日本云服务器 100M 带宽 不限流量 2G 内存 50g

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 KVM-2GB 5GB 100M 不限流量 日本&洛杉矶等

BudgetVM→$10 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量 1

BudgetVM→$80 月 E3-1230v2 16GB 内存 480GB SSD 硬盘

BudgetVM→洛杉矶高防云服务器 29 美元起 E3-1230 4GB 200GB 5T

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量

budgetvm→$12.5 月 日本云服务器 100M 带宽 不限流量 2G 内存 50g

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 KVM-2GB 5GB 100M 不限流量 日本&洛杉矶等

BudgetVM→$10 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量 1

BudgetVM→$80 月 E3-1230v2 16GB 内存 480GB SSD 硬盘

BudgetVM→洛杉矶高防云服务器 29 美元起 E3-1230 4GB 200GB 5T

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量

budgetvm→$12.5 月 日本云服务器 100M 带宽 不限流量 2G 内存 50g

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 KVM-2GB 5GB 100M 不限流量 日本&洛杉矶等

BudgetVM→$10 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量 1

BudgetVM→洛杉矶高防云服务器 29 美元起 E3-1230 4GB 200GB 5T

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量

budgetvm→$12.5 月 日本云服务器 100M 带宽 不限流量 2G 内存 50g

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 KVM-2GB 5GB 100M 不限流量 日本&洛杉矶等

BudgetVM→$10 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量 1

BudgetVM→洛杉矶高防云服务器 29 美元起 E3-1230 4GB 200GB 5T

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量

budgetvm→$12.5 月 日本云服务器 100M 带宽 不限流量 2G 内存 50g

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 KVM-2GB 5GB 100M 不限流量 日本&洛杉矶等

BudgetVM→洛杉矶高防云服务器 29 美元起 E3-1230 4GB 200GB 5T

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量

budgetvm→$12.5 月 日本云服务器 100M 带宽 不限流量 2G 内存 50g

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 KVM-2GB 5GB 100M 不限流量 日本&洛杉矶等

BudgetVM→洛杉矶高防云服务器 29 美元起 E3-1230 4GB 200GB 5T

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量

budgetvm→$12.5 月 日本云服务器 100M 带宽 不限流量 2G 内存 50g

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 KVM-2GB 5GB 100M 不限流量 日本&洛杉矶等

BudgetVM→洛杉矶高防云服务器 29 美元起 E3-1230 4GB 200GB 5T

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 1 核独享 2GB 内存 50GB SSD 空间 不限流量

budgetvm→$12.5 月 日本云服务器 100M 带宽 不限流量 2G 内存 50g

BudgetVM→$12.5 月 KVM-2GB 5GB 100M 不限流量 日本&洛杉矶等

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话

BudgetVM日本VPS测评 测评用数据说话