AlienVPS → 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯 纽约
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 【性价之王】 | 【线路之王】 | 【价格之王】 | 【配置之王】 |
| 【免费之王】 | 【香港首推】 | 【梯子之王】 | 【独服之王】 |

AlienVPS是一家主打低价年付的VPS的服务商,之前一直主推19美元年付的VPS(他家的配置也喜欢19这个数字),机房在拉斯维加斯和纽约(国内访问速度一般)。最近他家推出了秋季特惠,直降5美元,这样,原价就已经很便宜的19刀年付,仅需14美元。配置不变,依然是190M内存,220M交换,19G硬盘,190G流量。大家可能也注意了,他家的硬盘比较充裕,而流量相对较小,比较适合建站。此外,他家的Xen VPS也推出了年付24美元的特价。此外本文还将简单送上AlienVPS的评测(Ping值测速、纽约机房评测、拉斯维加斯机房评测)
AlienVPS – 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯/纽约OpenVZ Abduction — $14/year
190MB memory/220MB vswap19GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Xen Abduction — $24/year
190MB memory/220MB swap9GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Warp 1 — $4/month
512MB memory/512MB vswap20GB storage500GB/month data transfer on 50Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约测试ip:
纽约:199.167.194.101
拉斯维加斯:208.93.153.101
纽约:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 270毫秒 | 47 |
| 南宁[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 241毫秒 | 45 |
| 重庆[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 厦门[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 274毫秒 | 46 |
| 郑州[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 402毫秒 | 44 |
| 上海[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 232毫秒 | 44 |
| 浙江[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 245毫秒 | 42 |
| 山东[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 371毫秒 | 44 |
| 辽宁[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 261毫秒 | 46 |
| 福州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 257毫秒 | 47 |
| 宁波[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 248毫秒 | 44 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 516毫秒 | 43 |
| 合肥[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 252毫秒 | 45 |
| 乐山[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 267毫秒 | 46 |
最快:上海[移动] 232 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 516 毫秒
电信平均: 287 毫秒 联通平均: 386 毫秒
拉斯维加斯:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 194毫秒 | 51 |
| 眉山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 207毫秒 | 51 |
| 南宁[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 180毫秒 | 49 |
| 重庆[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 432毫秒 | 48 |
| 厦门[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 215毫秒 | 50 |
| 郑州[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 上海[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 156毫秒 | 48 |
| 浙江[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 159毫秒 | 45 |
| 山东[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 辽宁[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 166毫秒 | 50 |
| 福州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 200毫秒 | 51 |
| 宁波[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 172毫秒 | 48 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 492毫秒 | 47 |
| 合肥[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 192毫秒 | 49 |
| 乐山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 265毫秒 | 50 |
最快:上海[移动] 156 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 492 毫秒
电信平均: 228 毫秒 联通平均: 432 毫秒
UnixBench评分:
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET 14:30:06 up 25 days, 4:03, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.15, 0.06; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 14:30:06 - 14:58:011 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 9321629.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 1537.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1541.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 300124.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 87730.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 578670.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 569403.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 59794.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 2665.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2577.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 332.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 646641.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9321629.6 798.8Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1537.6 279.6Execl Throughput 43.0 1541.2 358.4File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 300124.9 757.9File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 87730.8 530.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 578670.8 997.7Pipe Throughput 12440.0 569403.4 457.7Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 59794.0 149.5Process Creation 126.0 2665.7 211.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2577.6 607.9Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 332.1 553.5System Call Overhead 15000.0 646641.8 431.1 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 449.1拉斯维加斯机房评测~# cat /proc/cpuinfoprocessor : 0vendor_id : GenuineIntelcpu family : 6model : 26model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHzstepping : 5cpu MHz : 2133.468cache size : 4096 KBfdiv_bug : nohlt_bug : nof00f_bug : nocoma_bug : nofpu : yesfpu_exception : yescpuid level : 11wp : yesflags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up aperfmperf pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisorbogomips : 4266.93clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtualpower management:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=16k conv=fdatasync16384+0 records in16384+0 records out268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.96411 s, 67.7 MB/s~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test--2011-10-03 16:45:28-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OKLength: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]Saving to: `100mb.test'100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.29M/s in 44s 2011-10-03 16:46:12 (2.27 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]~# wget ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin--2011-10-03 16:48:50-- ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin => `100mb.bin'Resolving dl.solcon.nl... 87.195.63.155Connecting to dl.solcon.nl|87.195.63.155|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /pub/test ... done.==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 330K/s in 2m 50s 2011-10-03 16:51:43 (604 KB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600]~# wget ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin--2011-10-03 16:54:12-- ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin => `test.bin'Resolving http://ftp.ovh.net... 213.186.33.9Connecting to http://ftp.ovh.net|213.186.33.9|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.==> SIZE test.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR test.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 1.18M/s in 98sUnixBench评分;
2011-10-03 16:55:52 (1.02 MB/s) - `test.bin' saved [104857600] # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHz (4266.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 16:58:23 up 3:30, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 16:58:23 - 17:26:171 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 12071752.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 2183.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1695.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 309520.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 86403.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 844233.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 518445.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 65670.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 3013.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3028.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 389.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 571007.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12071752.2 1034.4Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2183.7 397.0Execl Throughput 43.0 1695.0 394.2File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 309520.8 781.6File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 86403.6 522.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 844233.3 1455.6Pipe Throughput 12440.0 518445.3 416.8Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 65670.1 164.2Process Creation 126.0 3013.1 239.1Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3028.4 714.3Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 389.5 649.1System Call Overhead 15000.0 571007.8 380.7 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 505.4[VPSZJW]历史优惠活动内容
猜你可能想看的VPS
- 测评 酷番云→88 元 年云服务器测评数据 有条件的可以免费撸全球[VPS测评]
- php→Illegal offset type in XXX 错误原因及全球[VPS测评]
- TripodCloud→$38.69 年 500G 流量 美国圣何塞 C美国VPS[主机]
- php 在变量(参数)前加&是什么意思?全球[VPS测评]
- Uovz→2000 元 月 2*E5-2450L 16GB 内存 1TB日本VPS[主机]
- [ 黑五]PacificRack→$18.95 年 KVM-1GB 30全球[VPS测评]
- AlexHost→€11.8 年 1.5GB 内存 10GB SSD 空虚拟空间(主机)
- 微信支付接入报错→invalid spbill_create_ip全球[VPS测评]
- 疯狂猜成语 图猜成语一根细绳拉起好几块石板是什么成语?全球[VPS测评]
- 如何防止google voice被回收全球[VPS测评]
- AlexHost摩尔多瓦抗投诉 VPS 云服务器 1.5G内存/不限流/全球[VPS测评]
- 怎么才能保证WordPress网站搜索引擎SEO优化长期霸榜全球[VPS测评]
- 恒创科技 新用户优惠 香港CN2 GIA线路 1G内存 50g硬盘 2M香港VPS[主机]
- 什么样的AdSense广告尺寸和广告样式才能使AdSense收入更高全球[VPS测评]
- 百度搜索将打击网站搜索内容需获取权限才能查看的情况全球[VPS测评]
- TPE海缆故障通报-完成修复全球[VPS测评]
- 微基主机520常规优惠 虚拟主机2G三年付200元全球[VPS测评]
- BugetNode → 7G内存 70G储存 7T流量 荷兰高配鸡 月付全球[VPS测评]
- anyhk香港HKT商宽NAT VPS,1Gbps无限流量,终身8折¥3香港VPS[主机]
- 牛信云入选艾瑞《2022年中国跨境电商服务行业趋势报告》典型厂商全球[VPS测评]
- 快速云:云服务器和vps区别是什么云服务器和vps哪个比较安全2022-全球[VPS测评]
- 乐趣云怎么样?香港美国云服务器首月8.8元,新增IP5元/个美国VPS[主机]
- 酷锐云元旦钜惠:大量香港/美国vps优惠码,香港1核2G云主机仅20元/美国VPS[主机]
- VPS成立BurjeelHoldings全球[VPS测评]
- ExCloud:1核256M存/8GB SSD空间/100GB流量/OV虚拟空间(主机)
- 麻花云双12年终盛典:香港云主机9元起,老客户续费6折;安徽BGP线路v香港VPS[主机]
- CIO和其他IT领导者充分利用边缘计算增强业务的4个关键全球[VPS测评]
- 华纳云新春活动:香港CN2云服务器4核4G5M仅3476元/3年;美国云美国VPS[主机]
- 亚当云怎么样?香港安畅cn2vps带宽10M月付28元香港VPS[主机]
- 7月份,经济复苏边际趋缓,央行降息幅度先稳后升全球[VPS测评]
转载请注明原文地址:http://140.238.13.167:12355/read-163658.html











