【性价之王】	【线路之王】	【价格之王】	【配置之王】
【免费之王】	【香港首推】	【梯子之王】	【独服之王】

KVM.la是一家国人VPS服务商，今天在QQ上收到消息，KVM.la新上线了佛利蒙（Fremont）的机器，并且终于推出了符合他域名的KVM套餐（基于KVM技术构架的VPS），256M内存，15G硬盘，350G流量，基于KVM构架，支持Linux和Windows（Win 2003，Win 2008，令人瞠目的居然还有深度PE…），月付仅需45元。微魔好像也好久没写测评类的文章了（各种IDC不给力啊，不给测评的VPS…），所以这里再顺便和大家简单分享一下自己的一些测评数据（对KVM安装系统不熟悉的同学点这里充电~）。

KVM.la – 45元 256M 15G 35G KVM Windows 佛利蒙256MB独立内存15GB硬盘（RAID10）350G流量/月KVM构架Windows/Linux测试ip：184.105.153.88

购买链接

测评内容

本次测评在Debian 6下进行，测试结果即代表当时情况。

硬件概况CPU信息内存信息硬盘测试网络测试wget测试全国Ping值测试UnixBench跑分结论

初始安装完Debian 6的内存使用情况

root@VMVPS:~# free -m total used free shared buffers cachedMem: 247 34 213 0 2 17-/+ buffers/cache: 14 233Swap: 483 0 483硬件概况# Aspersa System Summary Report ##############################Date | 2012-01-27 07:36:26 UTC (local TZ: CST -0600)Hostname | VMVPSUptime | 5 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00System | Red Hat; KVM; vNot Specified (Other)Service Tag | Not SpecifiedPlatform | LinuxRelease | Debian-based version 6.0.2 (squeeze)Kernel | 2.6.32-5-686Architecture | CPU = 64-bit, OS = 32-bitThreading | NPTL 2.11.2Compiler | GNU CC version 4.4.5.SELinux | No SELinux detectedVirtualized | QEmu# Processor ##################################################Processors | physical = 2, cores = 0, virtual = 2, hyperthreading = noSpeeds | 2x3192.912Models | 2xQEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1Caches | 2x32 KB# Memory #####################################################Total | 247.98MFree | 210.82MUsed | physical = 37.15M, swap = 0.00k, virtual = 37.15MBuffers | 2.18MCaches | 19.64MDirty | 100 kBUsedRSS | 20.5MSwappiness | vm.swappiness = 60DirtyPolicy | vm.dirty_ratio = 20, vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10DirtyStatus | vm.dirty_bytes = 0, vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0Locator Size Speed Form Factor Type Type Detail========= ======== ================= ============= ============= ===========DIMM 0 256 MB DIMM RAM None# Mounted Filesystems ########################################Filesystem Size Used Type Opts Mountpoint/dev/sda1 15G 5% ext3 rw,errors=remount-ro /tmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev /dev/shmtmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 /dev/shmtmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev /lib/init/rwtmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 /lib/init/rwudev 120M 1% tmpfs rw,mode=0755 /dev# Disk Schedulers And Queue Size #############################sda | [cfq] 128sr0 | [cfq] 128# Disk Partioning ############################################Device Type Start End Size============ ==== ========== ========== ==================/dev/sda Disk 16106127360/dev/sda1 Part 1 1897 15595130880/dev/sda2 Part 1897 1958 501742080/dev/sda5 Part 1897 1958 501742080/dev/sr0 Disk 679477248/dev/sr0p1 Part 1 648 2713714688# Kernel Inode State #########################################dentry-state | 6319 4616 45 0 0 0file-nr | 256 0 24441inode-nr | 4471 89# LVM Volumes ################################################Cannot execute 'lvs'# RAID Controller ############################################Controller | No RAID controller detected# Network Config #############################################Controller | Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 20)FIN Timeout | net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 60Port Range | net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 32768 61000# Interface Statistics #######################################interface rx_bytes rx_packets rx_errors tx_bytes tx_packets tx_errors========= ========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========l 600 8 0 600 8 0eth 3500000 60000 0 15000 125 0# Network Connections ########################################Connections from remote IP addresses74.125.127.8 1112.81.121.10 1Connections to local IP addresses64.62.209.16 2Connections to top 10 local ports22 155339 1States of connectionsESTABLISHED 1LISTEN 6TIME_WAIT 1# Top Processes ##############################################PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND1 root 20 0 2032 708 612 S 0 0.3 0:00.60 init2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd3 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/04 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/05 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/06 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/17 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/18 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/19 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 events/0# Simplified and fuzzy rounded vmstat (wait please) ##########procs ---swap-- -----io---- ---system---- --------cpu--------r b si so bi bo ir cs us sy il wa st0 0 0 0 40 3 100 25 0 0 100 00 0 0 0 0 0 200 15 0 1 99 00 0 0 0 0 250 225 25 0 0 100 00 0 0 0 0 0 200 10 0 0 100 00 0 0 0 0 0 225 8 0 0 100 0# The End ####################################################CPU信息processor : 0vendor_id : GenuineIntelcpu family : 6model : 6model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1stepping : 3cpu MHz : 3192.912cache size : 32 KBfdiv_bug : nohlt_bug : nof00f_bug : nocoma_bug : nofpu : yesfpu_exception : yescpuid level : 4wp : yesflags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni hypervisorbogomips : 6385.82clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtualpower management:processor : 1vendor_id : GenuineIntelcpu family : 6model : 6model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1stepping : 3cpu MHz : 3192.912cache size : 32 KBfdiv_bug : nohlt_bug : nof00f_bug : nocoma_bug : nofpu : yesfpu_exception : yescpuid level : 4wp : yesflags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni hypervisorbogomips : 6385.82clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtualpower management:内存信息MemTotal: 253928 kBMemFree: 3704 kBBuffers: 27628 kBCached: 204192 kBSwapCached: 0 kBActive: 16692 kBInactive: 220528 kBActive(anon): 2600 kBInactive(anon): 2916 kBActive(file): 14092 kBInactive(file): 217612 kBUnevictable: 0 kBMlocked: 0 kBHighTotal: 0 kBHighFree: 0 kBLowTotal: 253928 kBLowFree: 3704 kBSwapTotal: 495608 kBSwapFree: 495608 kBDirty: 0 kBWriteback: 0 kBAnonPages: 5400 kBMapped: 4252 kBShmem: 116 kBSlab: 9704 kBSReclaimable: 5920 kBSUnreclaim: 3784 kBKernelStack: 552 kBPageTables: 372 kBNFS_Unstable: 0 kBBounce: 0 kBWritebackTmp: 0 kBCommitLimit: 622572 kBCommitted_AS: 38260 kBVmallocTotal: 766008 kBVmallocUsed: 5616 kBVmallocChunk: 752836 kBHardwareCorrupted: 0 kBHugePages_Total: 0HugePages_Free: 0HugePages_Rsvd: 0HugePages_Surp: 0Hugepagesize: 4096 kBDirectMap4k: 12224 kBDirectMap4M: 249856 kB硬盘测试root@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync4096+0 records in4096+0 records out268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.5833 s, 48.1 MB/sroot@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync4096+0 records in4096+0 records out268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.31768 s, 50.5 MB/sroot@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync4096+0 records in4096+0 records out268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.1846 s, 51.8 MB/s网络测试wget测试--2012-01-27 05:43:30-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OKLength: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]Saving to: 100mb.test?100%[===========================================================>] 104,857,600 11.1M/s in 9.3s 2012-01-27 05:43:39 (10.8 MB/s) - 100mb.test?.saved [104857600/104857600]

 

全国Ping值测试

序号	Ping的地点	响应IP	响应时间	TTL
1	襄阳[电信]	184.105.153.88	262毫秒	53
2	南宁[电信]	184.105.153.88	181毫秒	51
3	厦门[电信]	184.105.153.88	281毫秒	52
4	美国[国外]	184.105.153.88	5毫秒	60
5	山东[联通]	184.105.153.88	211毫秒	52
6	泉州[电信]	184.105.153.88	273毫秒	52
7	福州[电信]	184.105.153.88	276毫秒	53
8	宁波[电信]	184.105.153.88	253毫秒	52
9	合肥[电信]	184.105.153.88	273毫秒	51
10	丽水[电信]	184.105.153.88	252毫秒	52
11	商丘[联通]	184.105.153.88	204毫秒	51
12	安徽[移动]	184.105.153.88	193毫秒	47
13	绵阳[电信]	184.105.153.88	279毫秒	53
14	重庆[联通]	184.105.153.88	242毫秒	52
15	杭州[电信]	184.105.153.88	270毫秒	51
16	东莞[电信]	184.105.153.88	169毫秒	51
17	天津[联通]	184.105.153.88	204毫秒	52
18	郑州[联通]	184.105.153.88	221毫秒	50
19	上海[移动]	184.105.153.88	186毫秒	47
20	浙江[移动]	184.105.153.88	191毫秒	48
21	泉州[移动]	184.105.153.88	192毫秒	50
22	辽宁[联通]	184.105.153.88	214毫秒	52
23	益阳[电信]	184.105.153.88	167毫秒	52
24	浙江[移动]	184.105.153.88	192毫秒	48
25	福建[移动]	184.105.153.88	206毫秒	48

最快：美国[国外] 5 毫秒 最慢：厦门[电信] 281 毫秒
电信平均： 244 毫秒 联通平均： 216 毫秒

UnixBench跑分测试 # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 32 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102 x Execl Throughput 1 2 32 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 32 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 32 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 32 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102 x Process Creation 1 2 32 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 32 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: VMVPS: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 11 12:29:30 UTC 2012 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6385.8 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6385.8 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 01:59:30 up 28 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 27 2012 01:59:30 - 02:27:412 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 19964550.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 3263.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 2405.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 954374.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 249760.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2294195.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 2311212.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 411911.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 6720.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6983.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2097.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 3667232.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19964550.8 1710.8Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3263.7 593.4Execl Throughput 43.0 2405.9 559.5File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 954374.9 2410.0File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 249760.9 1509.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2294195.6 3955.5Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2311212.1 1857.9Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 411911.0 1029.8Process Creation 126.0 6720.0 533.3Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6983.9 1647.1Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2097.6 3496.1System Call Overhead 15000.0 3667232.0 2444.8 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 1487.5------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 27 2012 02:27:41 - 02:55:542 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 40026791.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 6510.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 12281.1 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1051261.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 278659.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3146686.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 4477483.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 786097.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 43548.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16441.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2139.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 5959239.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40026791.6 3429.9Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6510.0 1183.6Execl Throughput 43.0 12281.1 2856.1File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1051261.9 2654.7File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 278659.4 1683.7File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3146686.2 5425.3Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4477483.5 3599.3Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 786097.9 1965.2Process Creation 126.0 43548.3 3456.2Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16441.4 3877.7Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2139.4 3565.6System Call Overhead 15000.0 5959239.7 3972.8 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 2915.8测试结论

KVM.la本次推出的KVM套餐整体的测评结果还是符合人们（至少是我自己~）期盼的，更为关键是在遭到诸多国人VPS服务商弃用的KVM技术终于又回到了大家的视野，这对于许多技术控应该是个不小的福音~

[VPSZJW]历史优惠活动内容

[VPSZJW.SITE]常见国内外VPS服务器地区线路深度解析说明