AlienVPS → 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯 纽约
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 【性价之王】 | 【线路之王】 | 【价格之王】 | 【配置之王】 |
| 【免费之王】 | 【香港首推】 | 【梯子之王】 | 【独服之王】 |

AlienVPS是一家主打低价年付的VPS的服务商,之前一直主推19美元年付的VPS(他家的配置也喜欢19这个数字),机房在拉斯维加斯和纽约(国内访问速度一般)。最近他家推出了秋季特惠,直降5美元,这样,原价就已经很便宜的19刀年付,仅需14美元。配置不变,依然是190M内存,220M交换,19G硬盘,190G流量。大家可能也注意了,他家的硬盘比较充裕,而流量相对较小,比较适合建站。此外,他家的Xen VPS也推出了年付24美元的特价。此外本文还将简单送上AlienVPS的评测(Ping值测速、纽约机房评测、拉斯维加斯机房评测)
AlienVPS – 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯/纽约OpenVZ Abduction — $14/year
190MB memory/220MB vswap19GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Xen Abduction — $24/year
190MB memory/220MB swap9GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Warp 1 — $4/month
512MB memory/512MB vswap20GB storage500GB/month data transfer on 50Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约测试ip:
纽约:199.167.194.101
拉斯维加斯:208.93.153.101
纽约:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 270毫秒 | 47 |
| 南宁[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 241毫秒 | 45 |
| 重庆[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 厦门[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 274毫秒 | 46 |
| 郑州[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 402毫秒 | 44 |
| 上海[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 232毫秒 | 44 |
| 浙江[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 245毫秒 | 42 |
| 山东[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 371毫秒 | 44 |
| 辽宁[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 261毫秒 | 46 |
| 福州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 257毫秒 | 47 |
| 宁波[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 248毫秒 | 44 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 516毫秒 | 43 |
| 合肥[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 252毫秒 | 45 |
| 乐山[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 267毫秒 | 46 |
最快:上海[移动] 232 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 516 毫秒
电信平均: 287 毫秒 联通平均: 386 毫秒
拉斯维加斯:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 194毫秒 | 51 |
| 眉山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 207毫秒 | 51 |
| 南宁[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 180毫秒 | 49 |
| 重庆[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 432毫秒 | 48 |
| 厦门[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 215毫秒 | 50 |
| 郑州[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 上海[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 156毫秒 | 48 |
| 浙江[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 159毫秒 | 45 |
| 山东[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 辽宁[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 166毫秒 | 50 |
| 福州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 200毫秒 | 51 |
| 宁波[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 172毫秒 | 48 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 492毫秒 | 47 |
| 合肥[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 192毫秒 | 49 |
| 乐山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 265毫秒 | 50 |
最快:上海[移动] 156 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 492 毫秒
电信平均: 228 毫秒 联通平均: 432 毫秒
UnixBench评分:
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET 14:30:06 up 25 days, 4:03, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.15, 0.06; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 14:30:06 - 14:58:011 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 9321629.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 1537.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1541.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 300124.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 87730.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 578670.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 569403.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 59794.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 2665.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2577.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 332.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 646641.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9321629.6 798.8Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1537.6 279.6Execl Throughput 43.0 1541.2 358.4File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 300124.9 757.9File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 87730.8 530.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 578670.8 997.7Pipe Throughput 12440.0 569403.4 457.7Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 59794.0 149.5Process Creation 126.0 2665.7 211.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2577.6 607.9Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 332.1 553.5System Call Overhead 15000.0 646641.8 431.1 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 449.1拉斯维加斯机房评测~# cat /proc/cpuinfoprocessor : 0vendor_id : GenuineIntelcpu family : 6model : 26model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHzstepping : 5cpu MHz : 2133.468cache size : 4096 KBfdiv_bug : nohlt_bug : nof00f_bug : nocoma_bug : nofpu : yesfpu_exception : yescpuid level : 11wp : yesflags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up aperfmperf pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisorbogomips : 4266.93clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtualpower management:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=16k conv=fdatasync16384+0 records in16384+0 records out268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.96411 s, 67.7 MB/s~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test--2011-10-03 16:45:28-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OKLength: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]Saving to: `100mb.test'100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.29M/s in 44s 2011-10-03 16:46:12 (2.27 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]~# wget ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin--2011-10-03 16:48:50-- ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin => `100mb.bin'Resolving dl.solcon.nl... 87.195.63.155Connecting to dl.solcon.nl|87.195.63.155|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /pub/test ... done.==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 330K/s in 2m 50s 2011-10-03 16:51:43 (604 KB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600]~# wget ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin--2011-10-03 16:54:12-- ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin => `test.bin'Resolving http://ftp.ovh.net... 213.186.33.9Connecting to http://ftp.ovh.net|213.186.33.9|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.==> SIZE test.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR test.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 1.18M/s in 98sUnixBench评分;
2011-10-03 16:55:52 (1.02 MB/s) - `test.bin' saved [104857600] # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHz (4266.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 16:58:23 up 3:30, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 16:58:23 - 17:26:171 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 12071752.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 2183.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1695.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 309520.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 86403.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 844233.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 518445.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 65670.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 3013.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3028.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 389.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 571007.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12071752.2 1034.4Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2183.7 397.0Execl Throughput 43.0 1695.0 394.2File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 309520.8 781.6File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 86403.6 522.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 844233.3 1455.6Pipe Throughput 12440.0 518445.3 416.8Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 65670.1 164.2Process Creation 126.0 3013.1 239.1Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3028.4 714.3Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 389.5 649.1System Call Overhead 15000.0 571007.8 380.7 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 505.4[VPSZJW]历史优惠活动内容
猜你可能想看的VPS
- 补货通知 搬瓦工 CN2 GIA 三网直连线路$49.99 年付机器补货全球[VPS测评]
- AkkoCloud→15 元 月 1GB 内存 20GB NVME 空间虚拟空间(主机)
- centerhop→优质新加坡 VPS $27 年 1g 内存 25gSWINDOWS
- 便宜 VPS $0.99 月 256M 内存 5G SSD 1Gbps 全球[VPS测评]
- 疯狂猜成语 图猜成语两只金色的手在握手是什么成语?全球[VPS测评]
- soladrive→视频切片服务器等多用途 $395 40 核+80 超全球[VPS测评]
- 微信支付接入报错→签名错误全球[VPS测评]
- js 数字比较大小的注意事项→10 以上的数字必须转换类型全球[VPS测评]
- HKhoster→$69 月 1GB 内存 30GB 空间 不限流量 1虚拟空间(主机)
- 卫卫互联→香港 日本 韩国 国内等 CDN 有 DDOS 防护 30GB日本VPS[主机]
- 搬瓦工香港机房新上 VPS 套餐 又是一波买不起系列香港VPS[主机]
- Hostsolutions→€76 年 1 核 1GB 内存 3.6TB虚拟空间(主机)
- 云创网络洛杉矶安畅 cn2 gia 速度及综合性能测评,200M 带宽+全球[VPS测评]
- 搬瓦工 512M 小内存补货→1Gbps 带宽 cn2 gia 直连 $全球[VPS测评]
- 从Alpnames域名注册商跑路看我们应该如何选择域名注册商全球[VPS测评]
- 丽萨主机 美国原生 IP 三网回程CN2 GIA VPS 解锁奈飞、HB美国VPS[主机]
- DMIT 香港/洛杉矶/日本Lite国际线路年付七折,半年付八折日本VPS[主机]
- Virmach 2019中国新年促-512M 10G ssd 500G年全球[VPS测评]
- 很简单的图片不规则布局样式,纯css样式实现的图片瀑布流布局全球[VPS测评]
- BBR对比BBR2BBRPLUSBBR2CAKE锐速哪个效果好全球[VPS测评]
- ERP库存管理系统HTML5模板 - DreamsPOS全球[VPS测评]
- 硅云香港云服务器怎么样?硅云香港vps访问速度快不快?香港VPS[主机]
- 轻云互联,香港美国vps终身8.8折17元/月起,cn2直连线路,50G美国VPS[主机]
- 七安云怎么样?香港CN2+BGP线路VPS 1核1G10M 16/月香港VPS[主机]
- Rustrot-深绿色UI电商网站模板HTML5框架全球[VPS测评]
- 详细介绍vps云服务器及其作用全球[VPS测评]
- 者也IO,香港日本美国云服务器促销,2核2G1000元/2年,7折+内存日本VPS[主机]
- 阿里云香港服务器多少钱?阿里云香港服务器价格香港VPS[主机]
- 56云服务器怎么样?56云服务器价格和优势是什么?全球[VPS测评]
- 向日葵-漏洞科普:海外云服务器三种漏洞修复方法快收藏起来!全球[VPS测评]
转载请注明原文地址:http://140.238.13.167:12355/read-160970.html











