AlienVPS → 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯 纽约
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 【性价之王】 | 【线路之王】 | 【价格之王】 | 【配置之王】 |
| 【免费之王】 | 【香港首推】 | 【梯子之王】 | 【独服之王】 |

AlienVPS是一家主打低价年付的VPS的服务商,之前一直主推19美元年付的VPS(他家的配置也喜欢19这个数字),机房在拉斯维加斯和纽约(国内访问速度一般)。最近他家推出了秋季特惠,直降5美元,这样,原价就已经很便宜的19刀年付,仅需14美元。配置不变,依然是190M内存,220M交换,19G硬盘,190G流量。大家可能也注意了,他家的硬盘比较充裕,而流量相对较小,比较适合建站。此外,他家的Xen VPS也推出了年付24美元的特价。此外本文还将简单送上AlienVPS的评测(Ping值测速、纽约机房评测、拉斯维加斯机房评测)
AlienVPS – 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯/纽约OpenVZ Abduction — $14/year
190MB memory/220MB vswap19GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Xen Abduction — $24/year
190MB memory/220MB swap9GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Warp 1 — $4/month
512MB memory/512MB vswap20GB storage500GB/month data transfer on 50Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约测试ip:
纽约:199.167.194.101
拉斯维加斯:208.93.153.101
纽约:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 270毫秒 | 47 |
| 南宁[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 241毫秒 | 45 |
| 重庆[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 厦门[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 274毫秒 | 46 |
| 郑州[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 402毫秒 | 44 |
| 上海[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 232毫秒 | 44 |
| 浙江[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 245毫秒 | 42 |
| 山东[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 371毫秒 | 44 |
| 辽宁[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 261毫秒 | 46 |
| 福州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 257毫秒 | 47 |
| 宁波[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 248毫秒 | 44 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 516毫秒 | 43 |
| 合肥[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 252毫秒 | 45 |
| 乐山[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 267毫秒 | 46 |
最快:上海[移动] 232 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 516 毫秒
电信平均: 287 毫秒 联通平均: 386 毫秒
拉斯维加斯:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 194毫秒 | 51 |
| 眉山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 207毫秒 | 51 |
| 南宁[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 180毫秒 | 49 |
| 重庆[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 432毫秒 | 48 |
| 厦门[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 215毫秒 | 50 |
| 郑州[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 上海[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 156毫秒 | 48 |
| 浙江[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 159毫秒 | 45 |
| 山东[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 辽宁[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 166毫秒 | 50 |
| 福州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 200毫秒 | 51 |
| 宁波[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 172毫秒 | 48 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 492毫秒 | 47 |
| 合肥[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 192毫秒 | 49 |
| 乐山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 265毫秒 | 50 |
最快:上海[移动] 156 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 492 毫秒
电信平均: 228 毫秒 联通平均: 432 毫秒
UnixBench评分:
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET 14:30:06 up 25 days, 4:03, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.15, 0.06; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 14:30:06 - 14:58:011 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 9321629.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 1537.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1541.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 300124.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 87730.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 578670.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 569403.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 59794.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 2665.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2577.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 332.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 646641.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9321629.6 798.8Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1537.6 279.6Execl Throughput 43.0 1541.2 358.4File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 300124.9 757.9File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 87730.8 530.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 578670.8 997.7Pipe Throughput 12440.0 569403.4 457.7Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 59794.0 149.5Process Creation 126.0 2665.7 211.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2577.6 607.9Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 332.1 553.5System Call Overhead 15000.0 646641.8 431.1 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 449.1拉斯维加斯机房评测~# cat /proc/cpuinfoprocessor : 0vendor_id : GenuineIntelcpu family : 6model : 26model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHzstepping : 5cpu MHz : 2133.468cache size : 4096 KBfdiv_bug : nohlt_bug : nof00f_bug : nocoma_bug : nofpu : yesfpu_exception : yescpuid level : 11wp : yesflags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up aperfmperf pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisorbogomips : 4266.93clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtualpower management:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=16k conv=fdatasync16384+0 records in16384+0 records out268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.96411 s, 67.7 MB/s~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test--2011-10-03 16:45:28-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OKLength: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]Saving to: `100mb.test'100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.29M/s in 44s 2011-10-03 16:46:12 (2.27 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]~# wget ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin--2011-10-03 16:48:50-- ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin => `100mb.bin'Resolving dl.solcon.nl... 87.195.63.155Connecting to dl.solcon.nl|87.195.63.155|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /pub/test ... done.==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 330K/s in 2m 50s 2011-10-03 16:51:43 (604 KB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600]~# wget ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin--2011-10-03 16:54:12-- ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin => `test.bin'Resolving http://ftp.ovh.net... 213.186.33.9Connecting to http://ftp.ovh.net|213.186.33.9|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.==> SIZE test.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR test.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 1.18M/s in 98sUnixBench评分;
2011-10-03 16:55:52 (1.02 MB/s) - `test.bin' saved [104857600] # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHz (4266.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 16:58:23 up 3:30, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 16:58:23 - 17:26:171 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 12071752.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 2183.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1695.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 309520.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 86403.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 844233.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 518445.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 65670.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 3013.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3028.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 389.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 571007.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12071752.2 1034.4Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2183.7 397.0Execl Throughput 43.0 1695.0 394.2File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 309520.8 781.6File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 86403.6 522.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 844233.3 1455.6Pipe Throughput 12440.0 518445.3 416.8Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 65670.1 164.2Process Creation 126.0 3013.1 239.1Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3028.4 714.3Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 389.5 649.1System Call Overhead 15000.0 571007.8 380.7 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 505.4[VPSZJW]历史优惠活动内容
猜你可能想看的VPS
- NexusBytes→$21 年 384MB 内存 5GB SSD 空间虚拟空间(主机)
- 中日 IPLC 专线 VPS ¥120 月 512M 内存 10G H日本VPS[主机]
- ThinkPHP5 数组查询条件中设置 or 或者 and 方法全球[VPS测评]
- 真实测评 咖啡主机→首月¥20 1 核 1G 20M 洛杉矶 CN2 G全球[VPS测评]
- georgedatacenter→$7 月 洛杉矶不限流量 VPS 免费WINDOWS
- 便宜 ¥399 2 年 2 核 CPU 2G 内存 20G SSD 30香港VPS[主机]
- 特价 $69 月 E3-1230v2 16G 内存 2T 硬盘 10T美国VPS[主机]
- 腾讯云 - 域名续费减 20 代金券 云服务器满 200-100 代金券全球[VPS测评]
- Friendhosting→$1.75 起 首付 5 折 KVM 无限流全球[VPS测评]
- wishosting 法国 OVH 高防大硬盘 VPS 闪购活动,300全球[VPS测评]
- 搬瓦工最新优惠码整理(长期更新) 高速优质便宜的美国 cn2vps 推荐美国VPS[主机]
- HostKvm 双节促销 全场8折 新上架韩国VPS plan2/Pla韩国VPS[主机]
- StockVPS 纽约机房 512m内存15g硬盘500g流量100m带全球[VPS测评]
- CloudCone黑五闪购,每小时都有惊喜,超低价值得期待全球[VPS测评]
- Cloudflare Warp一键脚本+ 刷Warp IP脚本全球[VPS测评]
- Virmach 20$年付 日本大盘鸡补货 荷兰 美国圣何塞 纽约 50日本VPS[主机]
- Moecloud 美西 CN2 GIA Super 解锁流媒体 全球[VPS测评]
- 因搜包耽误员工下班,苹果将支付3050万美元赔款全球[VPS测评]
- 个人如何做跨境电商?全球[VPS测评]
- 人们为啥不爱吃海底捞了?海底捞上半年亏损达2.97亿 网友神评扎心全球[VPS测评]
- 快速云:云计算分类和云计算的特点全球[VPS测评]
- 香港云服务器的优势有哪些方面香港VPS[主机]
- 九零云怎么样?香港将军澳VPS,美国圣何塞VPS 2核1G10M 47/美国VPS[主机]
- 跨境电商平台首选香港服务器香港VPS[主机]
- 如何更改WHMCS默认后台路径让WHMCS系统更安全全球[VPS测评]
- 适合美容院的正能量抖音文案,唯美阳光,正能量满满全球[VPS测评]
- 好朋友51WORLD启动“地球克隆计划5”,我要去元宇宙参加了全球[VPS测评]
- CIO和其他IT领导者充分利用边缘计算增强业务的4个关键全球[VPS测评]
- 磐逸云怎么样?香港沙田cn2vps 带宽5M年付128元香港VPS[主机]
- 香港云服务器对于建站有什么便捷的地方?香港VPS[主机]
转载请注明原文地址:http://140.238.13.167:12355/read-160833.html











