【性价之王】	【线路之王】	【价格之王】	【配置之王】
【免费之王】	【香港首推】	【梯子之王】	【独服之王】

Edis最近也开始大力推广他家的基于KVM的VPS了（看来KVM越来越受欢迎了）。最便宜的KVM只需要1.99欧元/月，但是鉴于他的硬盘只有1G，即使是跑Debian恐怕也撑不起个Blog。所以这里只给大家介绍这家的3.99欧元的Plan。使用优惠码BESMART，可以将硬盘升级至5G（原有配置是2G）（查看性能测试）。但这批KVM位于奥地利的机房，国内连接速度一般（Ping值测速）。如果是面对欧洲用户，或者是其他需求的可以推荐尝试。关于Edis，这家主要经营欧洲VPS，有12年的历史，信誉应该不错。

EDIS – 3.99欧元 KVM 256MB 5G 100G 奥地利256MB memory5GB storage100GB/month data transfer on 1GbpsKVM测试ip：91.227.205.2直接购买本款KVM的测试报告（源于LEB）~$ cat /proc/cpuinfoprocessor : 0vendor_id : GenuineIntelcpu family : 6model : 3model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.1stepping : 3cpu MHz : 2533.488cache size : 4096 KBfdiv_bug : nohlt_bug : nof00f_bug : nocoma_bug : nofpu : yesfpu_exception : yescpuid level : 4wp : yesflags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep pge cmov mmx fxsr sse sse2 up pni popcnt hypervisorbogomips : 5066.97clflush size : 32cache_alignment : 32address sizes : 36 bits physical, 32 bits virtualpower management:~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=16k conv=fdatasync16384+0 records in16384+0 records out268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.89544 s, 142 MB/s~$ wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test--2011-08-09 18:52:36-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OKLength: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]Saving to: `100mb.test'100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 26.2M/s in 3.9s 2011-08-09 18:52:40 (25.5 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]~$ wget ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin--2011-08-09 18:51:52-- ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin => `100mb.bin'Resolving dl.solcon.nl... 87.195.63.155Connecting to dl.solcon.nl|87.195.63.155|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /pub/test ... done.==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 3.33M/s in 16s 2011-08-09 18:52:10 (6.15 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600]~$ wget ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin--2011-08-09 18:52:15-- ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin => `test.bin'Resolving http://ftp.ovh.net... 213.186.33.9Connecting to http://ftp.ovh.net|213.186.33.9|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.==> SIZE test.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR test.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 10.7M/s in 14s 2011-08-09 18:52:29 (7.13 MB/s) - `test.bin' saved [104857600]~$./Run # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Mon Jun 13 04:13:06 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.1 (5067.0 bogomips) MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 18:55:33 up 1 day, 1:01, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 09 2011 18:55:33 - 19:23:471 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 17431265.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 3006.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 5287.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1226378.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 340790.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2021024.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 2128746.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 386572.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 21050.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6874.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 885.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 3735875.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17431265.4 1493.7Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3006.2 546.6Execl Throughput 43.0 5287.5 1229.6File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1226378.9 3096.9File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 340790.4 2059.2File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2021024.0 3484.5Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2128746.1 1711.2Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 386572.4 966.4Process Creation 126.0 21050.1 1670.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6874.6 1621.4Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 885.4 1475.6System Call Overhead 15000.0 3735875.2 2490.6 ========简单的Ping值测速

序号	Ping的地点	响应IP	响应时间	TTL
1	襄阳[电信]	91.227.205.2	458毫秒	48
2	眉山[电信]	91.227.205.2	451毫秒	48
3	厦门[电信]	91.227.205.2	420毫秒	47
4	河南[联通]	91.227.205.2	385毫秒	49
5	上海[移动]	91.227.205.2	419毫秒	43
6	浙江[移动]	91.227.205.2	372毫秒	47
7	山东[联通]	91.227.205.2	458毫秒	49
8	美国[地区]	91.227.205.2	165毫秒	45
9	泉州[电信]	91.227.205.2	428毫秒	47
10	福州[电信]	91.227.205.2	436毫秒	48
11	沈阳[电信]	91.227.205.2	465毫秒	47
12	合肥[电信]	91.227.205.2	444毫秒	46
13	眉山[电信]	91.227.205.2	368毫秒	48
14	乐山[电信]	91.227.205.2	371毫秒	47

[VPSZJW]历史优惠活动内容

[VPSZJW.SITE]常见国内外VPS服务器地区线路深度解析说明