AlienVPS → 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯 纽约
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 【性价之王】 | 【线路之王】 | 【价格之王】 | 【配置之王】 |
| 【免费之王】 | 【香港首推】 | 【梯子之王】 | 【独服之王】 |

AlienVPS是一家主打低价年付的VPS的服务商,之前一直主推19美元年付的VPS(他家的配置也喜欢19这个数字),机房在拉斯维加斯和纽约(国内访问速度一般)。最近他家推出了秋季特惠,直降5美元,这样,原价就已经很便宜的19刀年付,仅需14美元。配置不变,依然是190M内存,220M交换,19G硬盘,190G流量。大家可能也注意了,他家的硬盘比较充裕,而流量相对较小,比较适合建站。此外,他家的Xen VPS也推出了年付24美元的特价。此外本文还将简单送上AlienVPS的评测(Ping值测速、纽约机房评测、拉斯维加斯机房评测)
AlienVPS – 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯/纽约OpenVZ Abduction — $14/year
190MB memory/220MB vswap19GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Xen Abduction — $24/year
190MB memory/220MB swap9GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Warp 1 — $4/month
512MB memory/512MB vswap20GB storage500GB/month data transfer on 50Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约测试ip:
纽约:199.167.194.101
拉斯维加斯:208.93.153.101
纽约:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 270毫秒 | 47 |
| 南宁[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 241毫秒 | 45 |
| 重庆[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 厦门[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 274毫秒 | 46 |
| 郑州[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 402毫秒 | 44 |
| 上海[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 232毫秒 | 44 |
| 浙江[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 245毫秒 | 42 |
| 山东[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 371毫秒 | 44 |
| 辽宁[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 261毫秒 | 46 |
| 福州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 257毫秒 | 47 |
| 宁波[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 248毫秒 | 44 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 516毫秒 | 43 |
| 合肥[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 252毫秒 | 45 |
| 乐山[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 267毫秒 | 46 |
最快:上海[移动] 232 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 516 毫秒
电信平均: 287 毫秒 联通平均: 386 毫秒
拉斯维加斯:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 194毫秒 | 51 |
| 眉山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 207毫秒 | 51 |
| 南宁[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 180毫秒 | 49 |
| 重庆[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 432毫秒 | 48 |
| 厦门[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 215毫秒 | 50 |
| 郑州[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 上海[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 156毫秒 | 48 |
| 浙江[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 159毫秒 | 45 |
| 山东[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 辽宁[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 166毫秒 | 50 |
| 福州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 200毫秒 | 51 |
| 宁波[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 172毫秒 | 48 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 492毫秒 | 47 |
| 合肥[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 192毫秒 | 49 |
| 乐山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 265毫秒 | 50 |
最快:上海[移动] 156 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 492 毫秒
电信平均: 228 毫秒 联通平均: 432 毫秒
UnixBench评分:
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET 14:30:06 up 25 days, 4:03, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.15, 0.06; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 14:30:06 - 14:58:011 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 9321629.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 1537.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1541.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 300124.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 87730.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 578670.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 569403.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 59794.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 2665.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2577.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 332.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 646641.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9321629.6 798.8Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1537.6 279.6Execl Throughput 43.0 1541.2 358.4File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 300124.9 757.9File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 87730.8 530.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 578670.8 997.7Pipe Throughput 12440.0 569403.4 457.7Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 59794.0 149.5Process Creation 126.0 2665.7 211.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2577.6 607.9Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 332.1 553.5System Call Overhead 15000.0 646641.8 431.1 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 449.1拉斯维加斯机房评测~# cat /proc/cpuinfoprocessor : 0vendor_id : GenuineIntelcpu family : 6model : 26model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHzstepping : 5cpu MHz : 2133.468cache size : 4096 KBfdiv_bug : nohlt_bug : nof00f_bug : nocoma_bug : nofpu : yesfpu_exception : yescpuid level : 11wp : yesflags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up aperfmperf pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisorbogomips : 4266.93clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtualpower management:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=16k conv=fdatasync16384+0 records in16384+0 records out268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.96411 s, 67.7 MB/s~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test--2011-10-03 16:45:28-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OKLength: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]Saving to: `100mb.test'100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.29M/s in 44s 2011-10-03 16:46:12 (2.27 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]~# wget ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin--2011-10-03 16:48:50-- ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin => `100mb.bin'Resolving dl.solcon.nl... 87.195.63.155Connecting to dl.solcon.nl|87.195.63.155|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /pub/test ... done.==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 330K/s in 2m 50s 2011-10-03 16:51:43 (604 KB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600]~# wget ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin--2011-10-03 16:54:12-- ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin => `test.bin'Resolving http://ftp.ovh.net... 213.186.33.9Connecting to http://ftp.ovh.net|213.186.33.9|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.==> SIZE test.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR test.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 1.18M/s in 98sUnixBench评分;
2011-10-03 16:55:52 (1.02 MB/s) - `test.bin' saved [104857600] # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHz (4266.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 16:58:23 up 3:30, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 16:58:23 - 17:26:171 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 12071752.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 2183.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1695.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 309520.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 86403.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 844233.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 518445.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 65670.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 3013.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3028.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 389.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 571007.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12071752.2 1034.4Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2183.7 397.0Execl Throughput 43.0 1695.0 394.2File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 309520.8 781.6File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 86403.6 522.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 844233.3 1455.6Pipe Throughput 12440.0 518445.3 416.8Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 65670.1 164.2Process Creation 126.0 3013.1 239.1Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3028.4 714.3Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 389.5 649.1System Call Overhead 15000.0 571007.8 380.7 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 505.4[VPSZJW]历史优惠活动内容
猜你可能想看的VPS
- php 多个数组根据指定键值分组方法全球[VPS测评]
- 8 周年促销 HostHatch→250G 大硬盘机房年付仅需要 15 全球[VPS测评]
- HostUS→OpenVZ 年付 16 美元起 KVM 月付 5.56 全球[VPS测评]
- 跑 BT 不错-Ikoula→€9.99 月 Celeron®G3900全球[VPS测评]
- MacBook 高效工作环境配置指南全球[VPS测评]
- 动态 Nat VPS OLVPS→40 元每月 1 核 CPU 512M香港VPS[主机]
- NameSilo - 网站改版新 UI 新注册域名降价优惠全球[VPS测评]
- WordPress搜索插件:Ivory Search全球[VPS测评]
- Google发布nofollow标签新规则,有重大变化全球[VPS测评]
- 更新WordPress网站PHP7.2新版本的注意事项全球[VPS测评]
- DEBIAN源更新报错解决方法全球[VPS测评]
- 极云(sa.net)日本BBTEC及南非半程CN2 VPS日本VPS[主机]
- HKServerSolution → 4G内存 20G SSD 3T流量全球[VPS测评]
- CloudCone 512M 内存 10G HDD 500G流量 洛杉矶全球[VPS测评]
- 40火伞高压电爬坡更让企业用电于民全球[VPS测评]
- 企鹅小屋:1核/512MB/10GB SSD空间/500GB流量/KVM虚拟空间(主机)
- 瓜云互联怎么样?香港/美国洛杉矶CN2高防vps 50G月付34元美国VPS[主机]
- HTML5绿色有机食品电商网站模板 - Organtio全球[VPS测评]
- 极客主机,优惠8折充值返25%,香港CN2VPS,日本软银VPS,新加坡日本VPS[主机]
- 免备案香港云服务器好在哪里?为什么企业要用海外云主机或VPS?香港VPS[主机]
- 蓝米云:美国cera vps/香港cn2vps套餐,1核2G/40G/1美国VPS[主机]
- 免备案服务器对权重和网站排名有影响吗?全球[VPS测评]
- 六一云:香港CMI VPS,10G防御,1核/1G/40G SSD/15香港VPS[主机]
- 狗云DogYun,香港cn2云服务器/优惠码/流量包,按小时计费云服务器香港VPS[主机]
- gcorelabs:KVM主机€1.08/月起;俄罗斯/美国/香港/日本日本VPS[主机]
- 漂亮的Css3响应侧边栏菜单,动画风格侧边栏导航菜单样式全球[VPS测评]
- 六六云:1核/1GB/20GB硬盘/500GB流量/30Mbps/KVM香港VPS[主机]
- 众创逸云:香港CN2/美国CN2降价促销,4核4G云服务器低至68元/月美国VPS[主机]
- 租用美国服务器有哪些安全方案美国VPS[主机]
- anyhk:香港HGC/WTT/HKT线路、台湾HiNet线路NAT套餐香港VPS[主机]
转载请注明原文地址:http://140.238.13.167:12355/read-160298.html











