AlienVPS → 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯 纽约
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 【性价之王】 | 【线路之王】 | 【价格之王】 | 【配置之王】 |
| 【免费之王】 | 【香港首推】 | 【梯子之王】 | 【独服之王】 |

AlienVPS是一家主打低价年付的VPS的服务商,之前一直主推19美元年付的VPS(他家的配置也喜欢19这个数字),机房在拉斯维加斯和纽约(国内访问速度一般)。最近他家推出了秋季特惠,直降5美元,这样,原价就已经很便宜的19刀年付,仅需14美元。配置不变,依然是190M内存,220M交换,19G硬盘,190G流量。大家可能也注意了,他家的硬盘比较充裕,而流量相对较小,比较适合建站。此外,他家的Xen VPS也推出了年付24美元的特价。此外本文还将简单送上AlienVPS的评测(Ping值测速、纽约机房评测、拉斯维加斯机房评测)
AlienVPS – 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯/纽约OpenVZ Abduction — $14/year
190MB memory/220MB vswap19GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Xen Abduction — $24/year
190MB memory/220MB swap9GB storage190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约Warp 1 — $4/month
512MB memory/512MB vswap20GB storage500GB/month data transfer on 50Mbps拉斯维加斯, 纽约测试ip:
纽约:199.167.194.101
拉斯维加斯:208.93.153.101
纽约:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 270毫秒 | 47 |
| 南宁[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 241毫秒 | 45 |
| 重庆[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 厦门[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 274毫秒 | 46 |
| 郑州[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 402毫秒 | 44 |
| 上海[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 232毫秒 | 44 |
| 浙江[移动] | 199.167.194.101 | 245毫秒 | 42 |
| 山东[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 371毫秒 | 44 |
| 辽宁[联通] | 199.167.194.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 261毫秒 | 46 |
| 福州[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 257毫秒 | 47 |
| 宁波[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 248毫秒 | 44 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 516毫秒 | 43 |
| 合肥[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 252毫秒 | 45 |
| 乐山[电信] | 199.167.194.101 | 267毫秒 | 46 |
最快:上海[移动] 232 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 516 毫秒
电信平均: 287 毫秒 联通平均: 386 毫秒
拉斯维加斯:
| Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 襄阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 194毫秒 | 51 |
| 眉山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 207毫秒 | 51 |
| 南宁[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 180毫秒 | 49 |
| 重庆[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 432毫秒 | 48 |
| 厦门[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 215毫秒 | 50 |
| 郑州[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 上海[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 156毫秒 | 48 |
| 浙江[移动] | 208.93.153.101 | 159毫秒 | 45 |
| 山东[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 辽宁[联通] | 208.93.153.101 | 超时 | — |
| 泉州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 166毫秒 | 50 |
| 福州[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 200毫秒 | 51 |
| 宁波[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 172毫秒 | 48 |
| 沈阳[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 492毫秒 | 47 |
| 合肥[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 192毫秒 | 49 |
| 乐山[电信] | 208.93.153.101 | 265毫秒 | 50 |
最快:上海[移动] 156 毫秒 最慢:沈阳[电信] 492 毫秒
电信平均: 228 毫秒 联通平均: 432 毫秒
UnixBench评分:
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET 14:30:06 up 25 days, 4:03, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.15, 0.06; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 14:30:06 - 14:58:011 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 9321629.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 1537.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1541.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 300124.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 87730.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 578670.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 569403.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 59794.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 2665.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2577.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 332.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 646641.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9321629.6 798.8Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1537.6 279.6Execl Throughput 43.0 1541.2 358.4File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 300124.9 757.9File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 87730.8 530.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 578670.8 997.7Pipe Throughput 12440.0 569403.4 457.7Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 59794.0 149.5Process Creation 126.0 2665.7 211.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2577.6 607.9Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 332.1 553.5System Call Overhead 15000.0 646641.8 431.1 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 449.1拉斯维加斯机房评测~# cat /proc/cpuinfoprocessor : 0vendor_id : GenuineIntelcpu family : 6model : 26model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHzstepping : 5cpu MHz : 2133.468cache size : 4096 KBfdiv_bug : nohlt_bug : nof00f_bug : nocoma_bug : nofpu : yesfpu_exception : yescpuid level : 11wp : yesflags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up aperfmperf pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisorbogomips : 4266.93clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtualpower management:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=16k conv=fdatasync16384+0 records in16384+0 records out268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.96411 s, 67.7 MB/s~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test--2011-10-03 16:45:28-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OKLength: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]Saving to: `100mb.test'100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.29M/s in 44s 2011-10-03 16:46:12 (2.27 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]~# wget ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin--2011-10-03 16:48:50-- ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin => `100mb.bin'Resolving dl.solcon.nl... 87.195.63.155Connecting to dl.solcon.nl|87.195.63.155|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /pub/test ... done.==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 330K/s in 2m 50s 2011-10-03 16:51:43 (604 KB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600]~# wget ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin--2011-10-03 16:54:12-- ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin => `test.bin'Resolving http://ftp.ovh.net... 213.186.33.9Connecting to http://ftp.ovh.net|213.186.33.9|:21... connected.Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.==> SIZE test.bin ... 104857600==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR test.bin ... done.Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 1.18M/s in 98sUnixBench评分;
2011-10-03 16:55:52 (1.02 MB/s) - `test.bin' saved [104857600] # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHz (4266.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 16:58:23 up 3:30, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 16:58:23 - 17:26:171 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 12071752.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 2183.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1695.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 309520.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 86403.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 844233.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 518445.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 65670.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 3013.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3028.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 389.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 571007.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12071752.2 1034.4Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2183.7 397.0Execl Throughput 43.0 1695.0 394.2File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 309520.8 781.6File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 86403.6 522.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 844233.3 1455.6Pipe Throughput 12440.0 518445.3 416.8Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 65670.1 164.2Process Creation 126.0 3013.1 239.1Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3028.4 714.3Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 389.5 649.1System Call Overhead 15000.0 571007.8 380.7 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 505.4[VPSZJW]历史优惠活动内容
猜你可能想看的VPS
- ShockHosting→$3.74 月 KVM-1G 200G 1TB全球[VPS测评]
- PHP 读取 txt 文件从 N 行到 M 行函数全球[VPS测评]
- X4B→主打 DDOS 防护 有日本 新加坡 洛杉矶 德国等节点 50G日本VPS[主机]
- 站长总结的干货→低价 VPS 适合建站 便宜 靠谱 好用全球[VPS测评]
- apache 设置 txt 文件直接下载而不是网页在线打开全球[VPS测评]
- MySQL 获取当前年份 当前月份 当日全球[VPS测评]
- $6 月 2 核 CPU 5G 内存 100G SSD 100Mbps 全球[VPS测评]
- Vultr 网络星期一→高性价比按小时计费商家 日本机房 新注册送$10日本VPS[主机]
- WordPress插件:SM.MS UPLOADER上传图片到SM.MS全球[VPS测评]
- WordPress插件:The Paste方便图片粘贴上传全球[VPS测评]
- friendhosting保加利亚抗诉无视版权便宜VPS,不限流量,年付全球[VPS测评]
- Spearware美国便宜VPS七折优惠,1核512m/20G SSD硬美国VPS[主机]
- 如何识别wordpress主题文件是否被挂木马?全球[VPS测评]
- fulltimehosting 圣诞节 85折 1.2$月付 德国LXC全球[VPS测评]
- Aksimaya-5.4$月付 新加坡 印尼 1C1G30G硬盘 500全球[VPS测评]
- 什么是VPS?国内VPS有哪些?全球[VPS测评]
- 云计算拯救互联网巨头?全球[VPS测评]
- 云计算竞争日趋白热化云计算行业市场前景分析全球[VPS测评]
- 青云互联:香港CN2 GIA VPS,月付15.2起;日本CN2 VPS日本VPS[主机]
- EdgeNAT,香港CN2+BGP vps 带宽5M 月付72元香港VPS[主机]
- 如何根据业务需求选择合适的云服务器配置?全球[VPS测评]
- 创e云:香港CN2VPS优惠专区,4核/4G/20G/2Mbps不限流量香港VPS[主机]
- 人们为啥不爱吃海底捞了?海底捞上半年亏损达2.97亿 网友神评扎心全球[VPS测评]
- 因搜包耽误员工下班,苹果将支付3050万美元赔款全球[VPS测评]
- 茶猫云:香港云服务器,支持windows,2M带宽,34元/月WINDOWS
- TabbyCloud:1核/1GB/20GB/2TB流量/50Mbps/香港VPS[主机]
- 性价比最高的VPS网络评测全球[VPS测评]
- windows 2012 R2系统更新KB2919355补丁,提示此更新WINDOWS
- 青云互联:香港荃湾云服务器限时七折,13元/月起;江苏挂机宝vps低至5香港VPS[主机]
- Hostkvm:香港/韩国CN2云服务器 大带宽VPS 2核4G,$7.韩国VPS[主机]
转载请注明原文地址:http://140.238.13.167:12355/read-160298.html











